ABSTRACT
Secondary bacterial infection is one of the important risk factors for the development of severe course and death in COVID-19. The rational choice of antibacterial therapy is based on the data of microbiological monitoring of pathogens of healthcare-associated infections. The aim of the study is to determine the main options for antibiotic therapy of Acinetobacter baumannii bloodstream infection in COVID-19 patients. Material and methods. A retrospective, single-centre, uncontrolled study of the incidence of A. baumannii bacteremia in COVID-19 patients treated at the City Clinical Hospital No. 52 in Moscow from October 2020 to September 2021 was performed. For each strain of A. baumannii sensitivity to the main antibacterial agents was determined. Genetic determinants of antibiotic resistance were studied by real-time multiplex polymerase chain reaction. The main therapeutic options for A. baumannii bloodstream infection were analyzed. Results and discussion. Bloodstream infections were diagnosed in 4.7% of hospitalized patients with COVID-19 (758/16 047). Gram-negative bacteria were the causative agents of bloodstream infections in 76% of cases. A. baumannii were isolated from the blood of 143 patients (0.89%). Detection of the pathogen in the blood of COVID-19 patients was associated with severe and extremely severe course of the disease. Most of the strains (93%) were isolated in the intensive care unit. The A. baumannii strains studied were carbapenem-resistant (CRAb) and phenotypically belonged to the XDR class. According to a PCR study, A. baumannii strains were producers of oxacillinases OXA-23, OXA-40, and OXA-51. Conclusion. The circulation of A. baumannii CRAb in intensive care units makes empiric therapy based on carbapenems irrational and ineffective. For the etiotropic therapy of A. baumannii bloodstream infection it is recommended to use combined antibiotic therapy regimens with the inclusion of polymyxin B and sulbactam.Copyright © Eco-Vector, 2022.
ABSTRACT
Background: Bloodstream Infections (BSIs) that arise secondary to urinary tract infections (UTIs) are frequently encountered in both community and hospital settings and are associated with significant morbidity, mortality, high healthcare costs and prolonged hospital stays Objective: This descriptive review aims to evaluate available information on the relationship of urinary tract infections with healthcare-associated and community-onset bloodstream infections to get a deeper understanding of improved public health interventions and suggest possibilities for future research. Material andMethods: A literature search was conducted using PubMed and Embase. Articles published during the last 10 years (2010 and 2020) were imported into covidence for the initial title and screening. All study s were reviewed by two independent reviewers and were eligible for full-text review if they mentioned urinary tract infection as a source of bloodstream infection. The data obtained were analyzed in Microsoft Excel. Result(s): Out of 65 articles reviewed for full text, 10 studies were selected. In total 6763 BSI cases were reported. We observed 2075 (30.6%) community-acquired (CA) BSIs compared to 1102 (16.2%) healthcare-associated (HCA) BSIs, and 1484 (21.9%) hospital-acquired (HA) BSIs. UTI was a major source of BSIs in community settings followed by HCA BSIs in most studies. Escherichia. coli was the most common pathogen isolated in patients with CA-BSIs. Hospital Acquired and HCA bacterial infections have the most antimicrobial resistance, compared to CA-infections. Conclusion(s): Urinary tract Infections are a major source of developing secondary BSIs. Escherichia. coli is a major pathogen in CA-BSIs. Multidrug-resistant organisms accounted for most of the BSIs, especially in hospital settings and among patients receiving health care.Copyright © 2023, Khyber Medical College. All rights reserved.